Trees and Methane Removal - The Role of Bark Microbes in Climate Mitigation

Authors

  • Dr Reji Kurien Thomas TOL Biotech, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26821/IJSRC.12.9.2024.120902

Keywords:

Methane removal, Forest management practices, Selective logging, Reforestation, Conservation of mature forests, Methane sink capacity, Carbon sequestration, Habitat disruption, Species selection

Abstract

Methane (CH₄) is a critical greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. With a global warming potential 28-36 times greater than carbon dioxide (CO₂) over a 100-year period, methane is responsible for approximately 20% of the warming effect of long-lived greenhouse gases (IPCC, 2021). Forests are traditionally recognized for their role in carbon sequestration; however, emerging research suggests that trees also play a crucial role in methane removal through the activity of methanotrophic bacteria residing in their bark (Hanson & Hanson, 1996). This study aims to explore the factors influencing methane oxidation in tree bark and the potential for enhancing this natural methane sink through targeted forest management practices.

This research synthesizes data from extensive field studies, laboratory analyses, and ecological modeling to quantify methane fluxes in diverse forest ecosystems. The study focuses on the role of methanotrophic bacteria in tree bark, comparing methane removal rates across different tree species and forest types (Bodelier & Laanbroek, 2004). The impact of environmental variables (temperature, humidity, soil methane levels) and forest management practices (selective logging, reforestation, conservation of mature forests) on methane removal efficiency is evaluated. A new approach to modeling methane dynamics in forest ecosystems is introduced, providing a more nuanced understanding of these processes (Conrad, 2009).

The study reveals that trees contribute significantly to methane mitigation by oxidizing methane in their bark, with methanotrophic bacteria as the primary agents (Conrad, 2009). The efficiency of methane removal varies significantly among tree species, with Eucalyptus showing the highest rates, while boreal forests, despite lower rates per tree, have a significant impact due to their vast coverage (Saunois et al., 2020). Environmental conditions, such as temperature and humidity, are critical in determining the rate of methane oxidation. Forest management practices that promote the growth of tree species with high methanotrophic activity and the conservation of mature forests can enhance methane removal, providing a dual benefit of carbon sequestration and methane mitigation (Bodelier & Laanbroek, 2004).

Incorporating the methane removal capacity of trees into global climate strategies can significantly bolster efforts to reduce greenhouse gas concentrations. Forest management practices should be optimized to enhance the natural methane sink function of forests, alongside their role in carbon sequestration. This dual approach can make forests a cornerstone of climate mitigation efforts (IPCC, 2021).

References

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

Shindell, D. T., et al. (2012). Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science, 335(6065), 183-189.

Hanson, R. S., & Hanson, T. E. (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiological Reviews, 60(2), 439-471.

Conrad, R. (2009). The global methane cycle: Recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(5), 285-292.

Bodelier, P. L. E., & Laanbroek, H. J. (2004). Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 47(3), 265-277.

Jørgensen, C. J., et al. (2012). Methane fluxes in temperate forest soils: Environmental controls and annual variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 26(4), GB4011.

Saunois, M., et al. (2020). The Global Methane Budget 2000-2017. Earth System Science Data, 12(3), 1561-1623.

Hugelius, G., et al. (2020). Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(34), 20438-20446.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-24

How to Cite

Dr Reji Kurien Thomas. (2024). Trees and Methane Removal - The Role of Bark Microbes in Climate Mitigation. iJournals:International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern ISSN:2347-9698, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.26821/IJSRC.12.9.2024.120902