Teachers’ Intervention in Plagiarism Detection Tool’s Assessment of Students’ Written Papers

Authors

  • Ms. Ghada Osman Elkhalis Elfaki College of Arts & Humanities, Department of Foreign Languages Jazan University, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26821/IJSRC.13.9.2025.130805

Keywords:

Plagiarism Detection Software, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This investigative literature paper examines the necessity of teachers’ intervention in Plagiarism Software’s (PlagAware) tool after it has auto checked the students’ academic written papers. The paper assumes that no matter how advanced the PlagAware software is, its assessment is not flawless; just like it is with the other applications of the artificial intelligence (AI). Through intensive review of the relevant literature, the paper devises three premises of argument whose findings answer the questions posed on what, why and how the teachers would intervene. The paper concludes that teachers’ intervention by re-checking PlagAware’s checking of students’ written work is partly amust to do and partly complementary to the proper marking and grading process.

References

Aissany, T. (2022). Software as a mechanism to reduce plagiarism in universities. Journal of Library Administration; 63(1):119-136. University of Batna, Algeria

Castelfranchi, C. (2013). Turing’s “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”. Italian National Research Council. Topoi 32(2) October 2013. DOI:10.1007/s11245-013-9182-y

IMU (2008). Citation statistics: A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU). in cooperation with ICIAM and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Version 6/12/08.

https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf

Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). Assisted Language Learning: Options and Issues in Computer: CALL dimensions. 1st Edition. Published31 May 2006 Location, Routledge. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708200

Meo, S.A. (2019). Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool? PMC 6398291. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Gov.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles-PMC6398291

Masri. H. (2017). Investigating the Research Challenges in the Arab World. Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences (GASJAHSS). Volume- 02; Issue- 03, 2024. Building Engineering Department, An-Najah National University.

Peters, M. (2023). Stop focusing on plagiarism, even though ChatGPT is here. Classroom Management Harvard Business Publisher. September 14, 2023

https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/stop-focusing-on-plagiarism-even-though-chatgpt-is-here

Reading Academy (2018). Turnitin: A staff guide to interpreting the Similarity Report. Reading Academic, UK. Cited at: https://sites.reading.ac.uk/tel-support

Soni, G. (2018). Plagiarism detection and prevention: A study. Volume 7, Issue 1, Jan-Feb. 2018. Article ID: IJLIS_07_01_001. International Journal of Library & Information Science (IJLIS). University of Rajasthan, India.

Wang, L. (2011). Semantic Computing and Language Knowledge Bases. ACL Anthology. https://aclanthology.org

UNESCO (2016). Out of date textbooks put sustainable development at risk. World Education GEM Report; December 2016. UNESCO Org

https://world-education-blog.org/2016/12/15

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

How to Cite

Elkhalis Elfaki, M. G. O. (2025). Teachers’ Intervention in Plagiarism Detection Tool’s Assessment of Students’ Written Papers. iJournals:International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern ISSN:2347-9698, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.26821/IJSRC.13.9.2025.130805